• Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Constantine Cannon Hired to Promote 'Contactless' Payment System | Main | Davis Polk Partner Named Fellow in SEC's Investment Management Division »

December 13, 2012


JW in TN

They must be idiots! Are these judges soft or just soft in the head? They need to spend some time doing ride alongs before they make such ill-informed decisions. If the furtive movements had not resulted in finding some contraband, would we be having this case at all.

Christopher A. Bailey, Paralegal

Interesting case on the line between legal and illegal searches and seizures. But those of us legal scholars know that there is fine line in the first place and the hindge is on probable cause, which is a matter of perspective.


This is not a sound decision and it sets the stage for uneven, inefficient law enforcement. A meandering analysis and ambiguous parameters for officers. The dissent hits the nail on the head. Ultimately, the majority opinion manages to make DC residents less safe.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad