The lawyers representing a whistleblower who claims Verizon bilked a group of federal agencies, including the Justice Department and Federal Aviation Administration, are trying to keep alive the suit in the face of a challenge from the telecommunications company.
Here's a central issue in the dispute: whether whistleblower Stephen Shea's complaint is too similar to the suit he brought against Verizon in 2007.
Shea collected tens of millions of dollars for his role in the earlier case against Verizon. The company settled last year for $93.5 million over allegations of improper billing for taxes and surcharges. Verizon didn't admit liability in the suit, which was only named the General Services Administration as a victim.
Verizon's lawyers, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr partners Randolph Moss and Jennifer O'Connor, argue Shea's other suit in Washington's federal trial court, filed in 2009, alleges the same conduct and should be dismissed. Verizon's attorneys call Shea's second complaint a "near carbon copy" to the first one "that brings no new information to bear." A trial judge hasn't ruled on the request.
Yesterday, Shea's lawyers filed papers to try to convince the judge, Gladys Kessler, that the second suit is "materially distinct" and should be allowed to move forward. The attorneys, including Christopher Mead of Washington's London & Mead, argue that the second complaint against Verizon focuses on other federal agencies not named in the first suit.
Recent Comments