Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« The Morning Wrap | Main | Roger Clemens's Lawyer Seeks to Undercut Chief Witness' Credibility »

May 16, 2012

Comments

Asma

While I understand at least some of the raneoss for the choice of locale, I had hoped that the USPTO would open its first satellite office in a location that I might actually want to visit or live Southern California, for instance. However, hopefully the USPTO's selection of Detroit will help improve that city's economy, in addition to increasing efficiency at the USPTO and taking a bite out of its infamous backlog.

Peter Austin

Interesting that he would chose the example of steam engines, where patents delayed progress.
http://www.thefreemanonline.org/features/do-patents-encourage-or-hinder-innovation-the-case-of-the-steam-engine/

Mark Parity

A treason piece of crap says what? Oh, never mind, it's already covered.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements