• Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Federal Judge Rejects Defendant’s Motion to Release Attorney Fees | Main | Pro Se Malpractice Suit Against Fried Frank Survives Motion to Dismiss »

February 17, 2012


Jose Martinez

Nice - another judge who decides what the result should be first and then reasons backwards to find a way to support it. This episode of judicial activism cost the tax payers fifty to a hundred million dollars plus the time of the appeals court to play the bad guy and reverse the trial court judge and actually enforce the law as written and intended by congress.


Trenga for President!

Darren McKinney

Tim Morgan

Outrageous judicial passivism.

If they fixed subcontract pricing, it is presumed the pricing was not fully competitive. Not only that, they concealed felonies. The judge must thing corporations are people.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad