The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has agreed to expedite a challenge to the $3.4 billion Native American class action settlement that a trial judge declared fair and reasonable.
At the request of the Justice Department, the plaintiffs' lawyers and the objector to the deal, the appeals court said Tuesday it will accelerate resolution of the dispute. The D.C. Circuit could hear the appeal as early as January.
The lawyers for lead plaintiff Elouise Cobell said 92 class members objected to the settlement, which addressed claims of decades of government mismanagement of Indian trust accounts. Senior Judge Thomas Hogan of Washington federal district court issued final judgment, approving the settlement, in August.
Several class members who did not object in a timely fashion to the deal want the appeals court to review the settlement. Only one class member, Kimberly Craven, has presented the D.C. Circuit claims that were filed in a timely way in the district court, according to the plaintiffs’ legal team.
“This appeal is brought by a single timely objector out of a 500,000 member class,” Cobell’s attorneys said in court papers (.pdf) filed this week in the D.C. Circuit. The appeal, the attorneys said, “effectively stays the payment of billions of dollars to individual Indian trust beneficiaries who desperately need those funds.”
Cobell’s lawyers, including Washington solo Dennis Gingold and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton partner Keith Harper, said in a filing (.pdf) that Craven’s appeal “is a political crusade to deter trust reform.”
“Because Craven failed to block this settlement politically, she now wants to kill, or at least seriously delay, the settlement through appeal,” Cobell’s attorneys said.
Craven, represented by Theodore Frank of the Center for Class Action Fairness, in Washington, said in court papers (.pdf) the issues in the dispute include the $2.5 million incentive award to certain class members and class commonality issues in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Wal-Mart v. Dukes.
In a court filing Sept. 12, Frank said the D.C. Circuit “will be the first one to address these important constitutional issues affecting the rights of hundreds of thousands of Indians.”
The appeal, Frank said, centers on questions of law that will not require the D.C. Circuit to examine the factual record of the dispute. Frank represents Craven pro bono.
“The Center does not object indiscriminately,” Frank said in a declaration (.pdf) in Washington’s federal trial court. “It evaluates many more settlements than it objects to, and regularly rejects inquiries where it does not feel it has a good chance of establishing precedent generally useful to class members in future litigation.”
Frank said in the declaration that the appeal is “brought in good faith. The issues Ms. Craven wishes to raise in her appeal are not only non-frivolous, but have been adopted by other appeals courts or the Supreme Court, and are of great importance to the law of class action settlements.”
Not sure why Kimberly Craven is holding up payments to Natives who so badly need it. Can't she opt out and do her own Lawsuit? I'm sure if her lawyer, Frank represents Craven pro bono now, he would do pro bono for her individual lawsuit, right? I can't see how Kimberly Craven appeal is a benefit to the Native people. Help me understand??
Kimberly have mercy on the Native people, times are tough than ever for us!
Posted by: Reb | September 19, 2011 at 11:21 AM
My question is what does she hope to gain out of all this when it's over, will she gain a higher payment? I'm sure i'm not alone when i say "that's my money and i need it now". I was really hoping to have a better Christmas for my family.
Posted by: Jesse Lorentz | September 19, 2011 at 10:14 AM
Is it legal that an individual tribal member can over-step the council of a tribe to appeal something as important as the Cobell settlement? Why then do we have leaders if they are not recognized first as to what their people want? I don't understand how one person can appeal for the entire native nation. She is outside the circle.
Posted by: Charlene Hardridge | September 16, 2011 at 03:01 PM
What type of finacial situation is this Craven person in? She probably is well off and don't need the money from the settlement like so much other people need it I hope she sleeps good knowing that she will be causing more hardship to her own kind.
Posted by: Roland Apauty | September 15, 2011 at 09:12 AM