• Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« After Death of Guard, Uncertainty in Case of Detained PDS Attorney | Main | Prosecutors: Clemens Seeking 'Unwarranted Windfall' from Trial Error »

August 19, 2011


Robert K. Wrede

It is quite astounding that an industry that has obfuscated and lied for years about the inexcusably deadly properties of its products on our citizenry has the chutzpah to oppose objective illustrations of what smoking acutally does to its victims so that the unfortunate people who are hoodwinked into smoking by the industry's multi-million dollar advertising blitz can at least have some objective exposure to the facts.

As Mr. Spangler so concisly put it: this one fails the "straight face" test.

Arizona Jim

Clearly this is more a perversion of regulating commerce then an First Amendment argument.

Jeff Spangler

This one fails the "straight-face" test, but you've got to admire guys like Abrams who usually can pass it.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad