Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« The Morning Wrap | Main | Divided Appeals Court Rules Against FBI In Death Penalty Case »

June 29, 2011

Comments

Peter Homer

The FTC and its Chair should spend less time trying to make clever sound bites and more time using scarce government resources to prosecute false and deceptive practices that have some realistic possibility of actually misleading real people. This enforcement action is illustrative of mommy-government at its worst -- the FTC actually believes that "reasonable" people would be misled by such silly ads (which, by the way, Nivea should be ashamed of). At bottom, that patronizing FTC attitude is insulting to "reasonable" consumers -- which is supposed to be the FTC's measuring stick for enforcement actions. Sure, maybe the exceedingly gullible or most desperate (who make up a minute % of the population) would be misled by such silly ads, but the FTC's mission isn't to waste scarce resources on those outliers who are anything but "reasonable."

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements