Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Friendship between Thomas and Crow Triggers Controversy -- Again | Main | Judge to Former White House Chief of Staff Sununu: 'When In Doubt, Write It Out' »

June 20, 2011

Comments

Ken in Kent

Alito's opinion was that the intentional infliction of emotional distress on a family at the funeral of their loved one is not First Amendment protected speech. What should be of more concern is that four so called liberal justices believe government should be allowed silence criticism of politicians during an election campaign. Which is more in accord with what the founders wanted protected?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements