• Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Political Activist Loses Legal Challenge Over Closed Courtroom | Main | The Morning Wrap »

February 24, 2011


Lowell Steiger

How much would the plaintiffs have received without these lawyers fighting for them? I'm guessing zero. It galls me how people get high and mighty and begrudge attorneys their fees when it's the attorneys who put in the time, effort and exorbitant costs in order to effect a fair result for their clients.

If the attorneys in this case were unable to effect a settlement, they would have been paid zero - this is the nature of contingent fees. The lawyers risk their investment in time and money and, for that, receive a percentage of the end result.

D. Shay

As an American Indian old enough to have seen numerous Indian settlements, why is that when Indians win wrongful legal actions, that the victim pays? If it were another race of people who won wrongful action suits, the defendents would be paying for the legal fees, or am I missing something?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad