Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Holder Memo Calls for Flexibility in Charging, Sentencing | Main | BP Official Resists Defining 'Legitimate' Claim »

May 27, 2010

Comments

Shabash Morton

The judge's pants suit, at least the amount he was seeking, was absurd. Not only did it show a lack of judgment, but also a misguided perception of the entitlements his judicial position allows. Without knowing the history of his judicial career, it is difficult to ascertain the reason(s) for the denied reappointment. The "pants" lawsuit surely did not help.

neuraloverload

Pearson is a perfect example of a bad judge.
His attempt to extort millions of dollars from a dry cleaners over a pair of pants is something closer to a badly written work of fiction than something you would expect to see in real life.
It must bring into question every court case he has ever been involved in and raise serious doubts about abuse of legal processes.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements