Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Ted Olson Honored By Time Magazine | Main | Two Suits Challenge Heart of Voting Rights Act »

April 30, 2010

Comments

Guest

As a counter-point to the comment that Topamax may be used to treat psychiatric conditions: maybe it can, maybe it cannot. If it can, and it's safe, there is no conceivable reason why the drug maker didn't get permission to use it that way, first.

anon

Topamax DOES treat mental illness though. Just like seroquel DOES treat many of the various off-label illnesses for which its manufacturers were treated. I can understand the huge judgments if the drugs cause harm--but the companies are being forced to pay substantial sums of money when the drugs actually treat the illness.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements