The District of Columbia, Nevada, Washington, Montana,
Utah, and Florida have the highest per capita rate of Internet crime
perpetrators in the United States, according to the 2009 annual report by the
Internet Crime Complaint Center.
The Center, a partnership between the FBI and the National
White Collar Crime Center, also reported that online crime complaints increased
substantially last year: a total of 336,655 complaints were filed—a 22.3%
increase from 2008. And financial losses linked to online fraud skyrocketed,
doubling from $265 million in 2008 to $559.7 million last year.
Complaints received by the Center cover many different
fraud and non-fraud categories, including auction fraud, non-delivery of
merchandise, credit card fraud, computer intrusions, spam/unsolicited email,
and child pornography, according to the report. Although the type of fraud
varied, advanced fee scams that used the FBI's name ranked number one (16.6%)
in 2009. Non-delivery of merchandise and/or payment was the second most reported
offense (11.9%).
In
addition to FBI scams, popular scam trends for 2009 included hitman scams,
astrological reading frauds, economic scams, job site scams, and fake pop-up
ads for antivirus software. Hitman scams are a type of email
extortion scheme in which the victim receives an email from a member of an
organization such as the “Ishmael Ghost Islamic Group.” The emailer claims to
have been sent to assassinate the victim and the victim’s family members. The
astrological scam is an old one that has resurfaced. In this scam, a victim
receives spam or pop-up messages offering free astrological readings. The
victim must provide his/her birth date and birth location to receive a free
reading. After receiving the reading, the victim is enticed to purchase a full
reading with the promise that something favorable is about to happen. The
victim neither gets the full reading nor something favorable.
The report noted that obtaining the gender and residence
of perpetrators is difficult because of the Internet’s “mask of anonymity.” The
Center cautioned that perpetrator demographics represents information provided
to the victim by the perpetrator so actual perpetrator statistics may vary
greatly. In
those complaints in which perpetrator information was provided, 76.6% were male
and half resided in one of the following states: California, Florida, New York,
the District of Columbia, Texas, and Washington. The majority of reported
perpetrators (65.4%) were from the United States. A number of perpetrators were
also in the United Kingdom, Nigeria, Canada, Malaysia, and Ghana.
The
report’s per capita statistics on perpetrators show the District of Columbia
having 116 per 100,000 population; Nevada, 106.73; Washington, 81.33; Montana,
68.2; Utah, 60.22, and Florida, 57.28.
“Internet
crime is evolving in ways we couldn't have imagined just five years ago,” said
Donald Brackman, director of the National White Collar Crime Center in a
statement. “The figures contained in this report indicate that criminals are
continuing to take full advantage of the anonymity afforded them by the
Internet. They are also developing increasingly sophisticated means of
defrauding unsuspecting consumers.”
The full report can be found at:
http://www.ic3.gov/media/annualreport/2009_IC3Report.pdf
It seems lately that I have had more and more intrusions caught by my Virus protection software. I only worry if they've all been caught. The bad guys seem to always be one step ahead.
Posted by: Georgette Pauls | June 22, 2010 at 05:49 PM
Sadly, the internet just provides bad people with new ways to con unsuspecting people. They can also more easily move from one con game to another. I am losing count of the trojan horses that my anti-virus software has stopped or caught and deleted. I only hope it caught them all.
Posted by: Ron Stone | June 02, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Nice one. Well written about money and internet crime
Posted by: nsmukundan | June 01, 2010 at 06:11 AM
Interesting article about money and internet crime. Relevant for most of us today, unfortunately.
thanks,
TG
Posted by: Thomas Goldman | April 23, 2010 at 12:25 AM
Good article and a nice summation of the problem. My only problem with the analysis is given that much of the population joined the chorus of deregulatory mythology, given vested interest is inclined toward perpetuation of the current system and given a lack of a popular cheerleader for your arguments, I'm not seeing much in the way of change.
Posted by: American finance solution | March 18, 2010 at 05:22 AM