• Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Akin Gump Buys Parven Pomper Strategies | Main | Appeals Court Reverses Sanctions Against Lawyer in Bankruptcy Case »

March 26, 2010



Although I have not yet read the decision, just the summary above, I am somewhat in agreement with his decision, e.g., no 20,000 pound "daisy-cutter" bombs next door, please. I find his rush to judgment offensive, however.
I guess he just had to take another swipe at the right to bear arms. Someone trying to be fair and unbiased would just have waited a little longer for the Supremes to rule.

Big John

Judge Urbina said the Second Amendment right to bear arms "is not unlimited." Apparently, he does not understand the phrase "shall not be infringed".

Further, the Second Amendment has nothing to do with the "right to guns in the home for self-defense", as the gun control zealots would have you believe.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad