Women currently make up 22% of all federal judges, a new study has found, and 26% of state-level judges.
The study by the University at Albany-SUNY's Center for Women in Government and Civil Society found that only two states - New Jersey and Connecticut - had achieved a "critical mass" of 33% women among the state's federal judgeships.
As for state judges, eight states have hit the one-third women mark, but 13 are below 20%.
The 33% threshold is “important because it is the point where women become a critical mass and where their number is large enough to induce change in the normative conception of leadership,” said center director Dina Refki in a statement.
Women’s share of the federal bench is at 10% or less in eight states – and nearly non-existent in Montana and New Hampshire.
The report says that the disparity cannot be attributed to a lack of qualified women. According to the American Bar Association, women comprise 48% of law school graduates and 45% of law firm associates. Instead, the report blames a lack of opportunity and access.
Women make up 45% of firm associates but only 22% of federal judgeships.
That 22% is higher than the percentage of women partners at major law firms, which sits at 19.
Posted by: Forzest | December 02, 2010 at 07:15 AM
I`ve been searching for this stuff for a long time. Thank you (and google).
Posted by: Ed from locker room bench | April 24, 2010 at 04:43 PM
Thanks for such a well-written and interesting question. This may well
have been the "original question" if Adam and Eve once existed.
Obviously this has been debated throughout history and if a definitive
answer had been found, we would have been taught it in high school. I
shall now provide you with a variety of answers to this age-old
enigma...
Posted by: generic propecia | April 21, 2010 at 05:51 PM
Asians are also severely underrepresented. I think at last count there were 3, i.e. less than 1%. Aah, the politics of race.
Posted by: hah | January 28, 2010 at 05:56 PM