Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Attorneys Fees in Cobell Case 'Well Below the Norm' in Class Actions | Main | Bryan Cave Partner Chosen for Commerce Post »

December 18, 2009

Comments

John Carter

It should be a simple test to see if Keurig's fluted cartridge does indeed produce a stronger flavor profile by making a few cups and comparing it to other machines.

It would probably take a coffee "expert" to make a judgement rather than a patent examiner and that may be a sticking point. The result would be just based on an opinion rather than demonstrable facts supported with mathematical proof.

Babyliss hair dryer

Keurig should totally be awarded this patent in my opinion. I have owned several coffee makers and my two favorites are my Braun 4 cup coffee maker and you guessed it, my Keurig single-serving coffee maker, which I take to the office.

It makes an excellent cup of jo fast, which is exactly what I need in mid morning and mid afternoon or during some pointless and unproductive meeting.

Companies need to be rewarded for their innovations, after all they invest the time and money on research, why shouldn't Keurig be awarded this patent?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements