Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« ThompsonMcMullan Partner Recommended for Federal Judgeship in Virginia | Main | Feinberg Questions Rescinding Pay »

September 30, 2009

Comments

ProfessorJ

The day in which you could put someone on the back of a horse tie a rope around his neck and bolt the horse from under him is gone. Polanski is entitled to a fair trial . That should be the starting point in any discussion. The guilty plea he took before a media crazy judge fails the test of due process. The current Judge admits that. Let the prosecution have their shot at Polanski. We'll soon see there is no bullet in the gun. They've lost the casefile. And they lost their star witness,"the victim", when she took the money. If I'm right the burden is on the prosecution to explain what is the point here-aside from publicity for them.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements