Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Obama Lawyers Talk Gitmo and Judge-Picking at ACS Convention | Main | ACS Panel: In Selecting State Judges, No System Is Perfect »

June 20, 2009

Comments

Account Deleted

I agree with Sam's comments. All too often sole practitioners and other skilled lawyers who don't come from "corporate firms" with backgrounds as employment-plaintiff lawyers are not always taken seriously or even considered.

Mark

Scary - judges who want to become advocates.

Sam

I sure hope that Judge Moore's comment about the hoped-for diversity in backgrounds, as quoted in this article, was more complete in its full context - because there is a glaring omission in the list, as quoted. That's practicing lawyers who don't come from "corporate firms." In fact, I am sure that in every federal District in the nation I could find skilled and experienced lawyers who would be glad to be nominated, to go through the confirmation process, and accept the current level of pay; I would look among the labor union lawyers, criminal defense lawyers, employment-plaintiff lawyers, etc. Voila, nearly all the problems identified in this article disappear.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements