Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Morning Wrap | Main | Rosenberg Headed to Hogan & Hartson »

October 09, 2008

Comments

Daniel

As an outside observer, the question I keep coming back to is this: you mean to tell me there are no lawyers in the state that can argue this case before the SC? If I were a member of that bar I'd be insulted. As for the AG, he doesn't know jack about the case (from what I've read). I find it hilarious that they would accuse Larisa of having the ego; I believe that exact psychological term for that is projection (putting the blame for what is true about yourself onto another person). For me, let the little guy have his 15 minutes of fame. It's not like oral argument changes anybody's mind anyway.

Down with the Elites

As a Washington appellate lawyer I'm pulling hard for Joe Larisa. I'm sure the Court is tired of Olson's act by now. Time for some fresh blood and new style at the Court. Forget the coin toss, just let Larisa roll. Olson can do his thing on another case later this term. The elite guys who horde the arguments are overrated.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements