Several months after losing a motion for summary judgment, Encyclopaedia Britannica is facing another possible setback in its legal malpractice lawsuit against Dickstein Shapiro.
In an order yesterday, U.S. District Judge John Bates asked Britannica to explain why he should still be able to hear the case, in light of a ruling yesterday from the U.S. Supreme Court that narrowed the ability of plaintiffs to pursue legal malpractice claims involving patent matters in federal court.
The high court found in Gunn v. Minton that state legal malpractice claims over how lawyers managed patent matters couldn't be brought under federal patent law. The justices reasoned that regardless of how a legal malpractice claim resolved, it wouldn't affect the original federal patent litigation.
Continue reading "Supreme Court Ruling Jeopardizes Encyclopedia Group's Legal Malpractice Lawsuit" »

Recent Comments