Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« D.C. Circuit: Defamation Suit Against Breitbart Can Proceed | Main | Outside High Court, Civil Rights Activists Pledge Fight »

June 25, 2013

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e201901ddb16bd970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Holder Calls Voting Rights Act Ruling a ‘Serious’ Setback:

Comments

Avon

Maybe the Voting Rights Act, the fancy-ID hurdles, and all other voting laws and ordinances should be set aside and forgotten as political issues.

Instead, why can't the courts simply throw out as unconstitutional any local practices that have a discriminatory effect on voting?

I don't have to continually struggle to enact and defend statutes or regulations to protect my equal ability to cast a vote. No minority should have to, either.

4thAmendmentjustice

Why is the voting right act more important than the 4th Amendment, Mr. Holder?

ColorBlindJustice

Mr. Holder's shamelessly divisive demagoguing of voter ID and other issues has been a "serious setback" for this country. The sooner he's gone the better.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements