Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Supreme Court Asked to Weigh Constitutionality of Obama Recess Appointments | Main | DOJ Weighing Implications of D.C. Circuit Ruling on Recess Appointments »

February 05, 2013

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e2017c369bff07970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Occupy D.C. Lawsuit Survives Motion to Dismiss:

Comments

Avon

Boasberg may be seen as soft on anarchism, but I think he showed admirable caution.

Indeed, it might've been tempting (for anyone who has read the Washington Post's coverage) to simply rule that any reasonable officer must necessarily have known that the materials were expressive conduct; even a sleeping bag helped make Occupy make its point. That could justify a ruling *against* immunity, even before any particular officer is identified.

Boasberg has pro-government cred already. He ruled for national-security withholding of the photo documentation of Osama bin Laden's death.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements