Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Marlowe to Step Down as Head of American League of Lobbyists | Main | The Morning Wrap »

November 27, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e2017d3e3a3b06970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference In 'Defeat Jihad' Lawsuit, WMATA Paid $35K in Attorney Fees and Costs:

Comments

Richard H

Exactly what is the defination of "hate speech"? Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the US Constitution PROTECT ALL SPEECH under the guidance of the FIRST AMENDMENT?

Jihad THREATENS the safety and security of American cituzens world wide and should be defeated!

Kate DeBraose

Every time hate speech is posted is an excellent opportunity for American teachers to use that fact as a teaching moment.
The story of Hitler's Third Reich and its monstrous damage can, and should be taught and constantly compared with ever more recent efforts to restart their Monstrously hateful and destructive philosophies.

They were, and are now, the AntiChrist for our modern times.

MMA

Agreed, I am Christian, but I have a number of Muslim friends and I do not justify any kind of hate speech. The next time WMATA should save its money and do it the DC way. Get some thugs to just tear em up or use them for graffiti (ie.street art). That way you comply with the law, avoid posting hate speech and you support your community.

Win-Win

Ddicks

Glad WMATA did the right thing.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements