Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Montana Judge, Author of Racist Email About Obama, to Take Senior Status | Main | The Morning Wrap »

October 04, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e2017d3c8184d4970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Judge Weighs Allowing Controversial 'Defeat Jihad' Ads in D.C. Metro Stations:

Comments

Jag Pop

The ad reads: "In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man," with the tag, "Support Israel/Defeat Jihad."


"Any war"? How many wars did the "civilized man" plan on having?

And are these unnecessary wars? Perhaps they are pre-emptive?
Perchance these are over resources - water, livingspace, oil?
How about colonizing wars? Do these wars ignore international law? Do these wars flaunt international laws?

Let me improve upon the ad language.

Any war is never enough wars for the civilized man.
The superior man supports other superior men in Any War uber the inferior.

Support Israel / Defeat Jihad

Ric-O

"He and Collyer tussled over whether the ad constituted hate speech, with Collyer saying that she did not agree with the New York judge's finding that the ad was solely 'core political speech.'"

Let me get this straight- a US District judge is arguing about "hate" speech?!? Is she a drunkard? She needs to recuse herself immediately- she has no understanding of the First Amendment, which is patently obvious by her even allowing the word "hate" to be mentioned in this hearing.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements