Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Covington Hires Away Crowell Government Contracts Partner | Main | DOJ Urges D.C. Circuit to Support Cigarette Graphic Warning Labels »

April 10, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e2016764e4b66e970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Local Attorney Fights Allegations of Misappropriation and Dishonesty:

Comments

Nyamodi Ochieng-Nyamogo.

It would be professionally helpful to know the eventual outcome of this matter before the D.C. Court of Appeals! If possible, please post directly to my email address below!

Samuel N. Omwenga

It's a shame a blog of your caliber cannot get simple facts of a case and presents others in a distorted manner as you have in the reporting of the story about Omwenga appellate hearing. The alleged amount of misappropriation is $550 not the $2050 out of handling $46,000. The amount of savings I negotiated for my client was not $2050 but $14,000. The $2050 was an additional savings after the client agreed to pay $48,050 and I did not "keep" this amount as you erroneously state in your story but this money was returned to the client minus the $550 kept as legal fees and now is preposterously being claimed as misappropriation. All this is in the record.

I am therefore demanding and expect a correction of the story to reflect these facts.

N.B I posted this comment here but someone either mischievously or inadvertently posted it on an unrelated story at http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2012/04/judge-rules-against-dc-courts-employee-in-discrimination-case.html?cid=6a00d83451d94869e201630554ce61970d which has nothing to do with me further aggravating what you have done in not accurately reporting the case.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements