Updated 4:13 p.m.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) voted against a federal judicial nominee today that he actually supports. Although that sounds like a mistake, Lee did this on purpose.
The reason: Lee got caught between a nominee and a hardened political stance during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill when it came to Robert Shelby, a non-controversial nominee for district judge in Lee’s home state of Utah.
Lee has voted against all of President Barack Obama’s nominees as a response to Obama’s controversial recess appointments to consumer and labor boards in January. And he didn’t back down today.
As Lee explained: “I want to express my unequivocal support for the president’s nomination of Robert Shelby….He’ll be an outstanding judge and I do look forward to his confirmation.”
“I will nevertheless ask to be recorded as a 'no' on his nomination,” Lee said. “The president may not ignore the constitution and simply decide for himself when the Senate is or is not in session for purposes of the recess appointments clause.”
Senate Republicans have announced they will file an amicus brief challenging the constitutionality of Obama’s appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.
Shelby was approved by a voice vote (with Lee recorded as a 'no') and will now be reported to the Senate floor for a full vote at a later date. The committee also moved Michael Shea for U.S. District Judge for the District of Connecticut on a vote of 15-3, and Gonzalo P. Curiel for U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of California on a voice vote (with Lee recorded as a 'no').
Also on Thursday, the full Senate confirmed two judges to federal district courts in Texas: Gregg Costa for the Southern District of Texas by a vote of 97-2; and David Guaderrama for the Western District of Texas, by voice vote.

Senator Lee's "NO" vote supported nothing. If he is upset with the president, he should argue his point, not stomp around like a little boy who had his toy taken away. Our Founding Fathers would have laughed at his idiocy.
Posted by: L. A. Chancey | May 08, 2012 at 03:04 AM
Senator Lee's childish, churlish action will assure that he gets real opposition when he next runs for reelection. Recess appointments have ben used by Republican and Democratic presidents alike. And the alleged loop hole of keepin the Senate in session when it was not in session, I hope will be ignored by the Courts.
Posted by: Samuel Golden | April 28, 2012 at 08:56 AM
Sounds like Senator Lee is acting childish.
Posted by: anon | April 27, 2012 at 01:58 PM
Senator Lee's "NO" vote supported the Constitution principles most Americans believe in, a rational approach to the balance of power. Thank you Senator Lee for standing by your principles and upholding the wisdom of our Founding Fathers.
Posted by: L.A. Chancey | April 27, 2012 at 09:14 AM