• Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Fed Judge Rejects $50.2M Civil Penalty In False Claims Case | Main | DOJ Reaches $90M Settlement With Oil Company Unit In Deepwater Suit »

February 17, 2012


Ari Daniels

This is incredible. It's extremely rare that a "little guy" gets even a nod—an acknowledgement of existence—from the court when facing down a "big guy." To say that Etlin "suffered no harm, only benefit" is plain silly as well. If they had represented her, instead of following the path of least resistance (or worse), they could have prevented the harm that is currently befalling her. They didn't directly steal Etlin's money, but they didn't try to prevent the theft either. No harm?

Note: I'm familiar with this case, as I'm the "child" (34 years old) for whom the child support is supposedly being sequestered, illegally.


Karen Winner

Congratulations to self-represented litigant Michelle Etlin, for having the tenacity and courage to fight for her day in court!
Karen Winner, Esq.
author of Divorced From Justice (HarperCollins publishers)

Chris Hoey

I learned in my first year following law school to beware the pro se plaintiff as judges and courts bend over backwards to give them their day in court,

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad