A new filing today in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia shows that attorneys for a local rabbi and the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics are in settlement talks over the handling of a local election scheduled during a Jewish holiday.
Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld sued (PDF) the board over a special election that took place on April 26, which was also the eighth and final day of Passover. The eighth day is one of several when observant Jews are barred from signing their name or completing an electronic circuit, which, Herzeld said, meant they couldn’t vote.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan denied a last-minute request for an emergency injunction to reschedule the election, but gave Herzfeld a green light to pursue other claims against the city over their handling of the situation. The board said that their hands were tied by law from changing special election dates except in extreme circumstances.
On Monday, both sides filed a joint motion to stay (PDF) proceedings for another month, telling the court that they had drafted language of a written settlement and “are in the process of negotiating the terms of the agreement.”
Herzfeld’s attorney, Steven Lieberman of Washington’s Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbech, declined to comment on settlement talks. A representative of the board wasn’t immediately available for comment.
The settlement, according to the motion, would make it unnecessary for the court to decide several other pending motions. The city had filed to strike language from Herzfeld’s amended complaint accusing city officials of falsely stating that even if the election had fallen on Christmas Day, they would not have been able to change the date.
The case was reassigned in September from Sullivan to U.S. District Judge James Gwin of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The court occasionally reassigns cases to judges outside of the district in order to ease the docket.

The Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington, as the government affairs arm serving over 100 synagogues and Jewish agencies in our region, while saddened by this holiday conflict, was very appreciative of the efforts of the Board of Ethics and Elections to communicate absentee ballot options to affected community members. We have been proud to work in collaboration with DC government and interfaith and civil rights partners to find a legislative solution that would avoid this issue in the future.
Posted by: Debra Linick | November 10, 2011 at 07:28 AM
Interesting case, I do think the election would never have been set on Christmas.Nevertheless,while I understand Plaintiff's postion,my view as an American Jewish attorney is that while Rosh Hashanah or Yom Kippor might be analagous to Christmas,but the eight day of Passover is not. America is a secular country,where you have freedom of religion,and limitations in the entanglement of government with religion,but that ought not require the government to have to reschedule a secular matter,even one as important as an election, because a small religious minority chooses not to participate in it for religious reasons. Perhaps an absentee ballot procedure would have solved teh problem.
Posted by: JeffreyMeyers | November 08, 2011 at 03:54 PM
Separation of Chruch and State should prevail here. We cannot account for every relgious traditon in the world to run this country. It affect very few in our community, mostly orthodox jews, but all the other jews were good to go. So what percentage of the population were affected. Bet less than 1%, which means any relgion could have faced the same thing! Case dismissed! I am a huge supported of Jews FYI!
Posted by: barrie Daneker | November 08, 2011 at 09:26 AM