Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Appeals Court Unkind To Abramoff Friend In Plea Deal Dispute | Main | Fannie Mae Conservator Loses Bid to Halt Class Action »

November 14, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e20153930cd243970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Clement, Tribe Debate Obama's Health Care Law:

Comments

Ratkellar

The comment is incorrect. EMTALA applies only if the hospital accepts federal payments. The vast majority does accept such payments.
Citizenship is irrelevant to EMTALA. The "participating hospital" must take all comers.
Regulating a hospital is a different question than regulating an individual citizen. The Hospital is already participating in commerce AND accepting government payments for such services.

Protricity

these rhetorical questions are sooooooo old and sooooooooooo answered years ago.

How can you 'force' a citizen to buy a product he doesn't need?

Answer is SO EASY.
1. Citizen has a legal right to not be turned away from the ER when he has no way of paying for services, no insurance, and even no intent to ever pay (which many of them do not).
2. We all make up for that money with higher premiums and less coverage for ourselves. Thus this isn't some product the customer has no interest in purchasing. This is a DIRECT LIABILITY that citizen has that WE are directly RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING for him.

So you can either change the law to allow ERs to refuse patience that cannot pay (which I'm sure is what many of you wingnuts want anyway, right?), or you require everyone to have coverage to fix this broken system once and for all. YOU CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. STOP DEFENDING THE STATUS QUO

But you know and understand this question already, don't you. Not gonna stop you from asking it again and again on every forum you can find as if you have some kind of point, will it?

Next question!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements