Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Grassley Critiques Qualifications of Four Judicial Nominees | Main | Morning Wrap »

June 08, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e2014e8900964b970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Restrictive Rules Announced for Federal Courts Camera Experiment:

Comments

Jack McDonald

The requirement that all parties consent is a killer. This will rarely, if ever, occur. Minnesota had this requirement a few years ago and the number of cases televised came to zero. Add this to the restriction to civil proceedings, that rarely have much news value or interest, and you have an experiment destined to fail.

Kent Scheidegger

"We ought to be able to cover court proceedings the way we cover congressional hearings. What are they afraid of?"

Given what a farce televised congressional hearings have become, that is not exactly the strongest argument.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements