Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Law Professor Questions Constitutionality of Bill to Extend Mueller's Term | Main | Restrictive Rules Announced for Federal Courts Camera Experiment »

June 08, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e2014e89007410970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Grassley Critiques Qualifications of Four Judicial Nominees :

Comments

Rick

"Given the talent available in New York City"..

Caitlin Halligan, Obama's DC Circuit nominee, is that type of talent...She has the education and experience...She has argued 4 cases before the SCOTUS...Most lawyers would be fortunate to argue 1 case before the high court, she has argued 4..She EASILY could have been nominated to the SCOTUS....She is about as well qualified a judicial nominee there ever was, and that is not hyperbole....And even with her stellar record, Senator Reid will likely have to file cloture to get her an up/down vote....So what i'm getting at is republicans are finding something to complain about with every nominee....It is nothing but partsian politics at its absolute worst....Republicans poor treatment of judicial nominees wasn't limited with Goodwin Liu, shabby treatment of judicial nominees is occuring pretty much on a non-stop basis....

Marcus E. Cohn

As a trial lawyer of 40 years,and an independent, I do not believe that these nominees should foist their lack of trial experience, both criminal and civil on either the bar or the civil litigants and criminal defendants who would come before them.
This not a political statement, but a practical judgement. Litigation is too expensive and the application of complex rules before and after trial-not to mention the rules of evidence-take years of practice to become intimately familiar with. judges must apply these rules quickly and correctly during a trial or risk an expensive and time consuming appellate process that can lead to an expensive retrial for both the government and private parties.
I respect the President, but his lack of practical experience before trial judges, as well as Sen. Schumer's, is showing. Given the talent available in New York City, these nominations are inexcusable.

Rick

Since 1/20/09 republicans have found something wrong with pretty much every judicial nomination of President Obama...

Even non-controversial nominees like Albert Diaz 4th-Circuit, waited 13 months for confirmation, and James Wynn (also 4th. Circuit) waited 9 months..Both were confirmed by "unanmious consent"...

Just more repubican games being played with Obama's judicial nominations...This is nothing new...

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements