Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Legal Groups Urge Broad Search for Federal Prisons Director | Main | AT&T, T-Mobile Chiefs Defend Proposed Merger »

May 11, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e201538e6b08cc970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference King & Spalding Offers New Details on Marriage Mess:

Comments

Gal Friday

Re: "So the question is why is this particular case so bothersome to them?"

Mmm, perhaps because the restriction or removal of a minorities' civil rights for no discernable purpose is viewed as abhorrent by enlightened people?

Skeptical Cicada

Any knee-jerk comments from Eric Holder or Elena Kagan yet?

some guy

Clement represented the NRA last year in a second amendment case last year while working at K and S. He was also planning on representing the states in their health care law suit while still working at K and S(and probably still will at his new firm).
K and S seemed to have no trouble with Clement's constitutional cases before. So the question is why is this particular case so bothersome to them?

Harry Belafonte

"this is not the kind of case the firm generally takes"

B.S.

K&S represented Guantanomo detainees in 2009. Were those "corporate" representations?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements