Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« White House on Kagan for Supreme Court: No Decision Yet | Main | Cobell, Pigford Settlements Stall Again in Senate »

May 07, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e201348095fe48970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Appeals Court Rules Against Challenge to 'So Help Me God' in Oath:

Comments

Matt

Newdow is the Rosa Parks of secular Americans. He may lose in court, but he has cemented himself in history books as a hero.

Bob Ritter

The appeals court opinion perpetuates the myth that George Washington's appended the presidential oath with "so help me God" in order to say that the practice started with the first president. But I believe the real problem in this case is the fear of judges of issuing or upholding an injunction against the Chief Justice. For example, during the hearing on our motion for a preliminary injunction, Judge Walton was absolutely flabbergasted that Mike Newdow would suggest that he order his boss not to say "so help me God." But the fact of the matter is that the Constitution doesn't specify that the Chief Justice administer the presidential oath, so the Chief Justice is merely performing a ministerial duty.
Bob Ritter, co-counsel of the plaintiffs

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements