Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« In Robert Wone Case, Defense Lawyers Lodge Attack on Indictment | Main | The Morning Wrap »

November 06, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e20128755f2bec970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Norton Introduces Bill to Elect D.C. Prosecutor :

Comments

dcuser

Let's think about this a little bit:

1) The DC Government is now in a fiscal crisis, and the DC Office of Attorney General has had to lay off lawyers and staff to the point where it can no longer handle many of its duties. Holmes-Norton's great idea: Make the District pay for criminal law enforcement too! Great -- maybe she'd like to tell us which schools or youth rec centers she proposes to close so that we can afford that...?

2) The DC Government is notoriously bad at criminal enforcement, as indicated by Colbert King's (terrific) columns on DC's utterly dysfunctional Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services. (Yes, that's the department that believes their job is to keep juvenile delinquents on the streets, essentially unsupervised, until they either kill or get killed.) Homes-Norton's brilliant idea: Put District hacks in charge of the rest of criminal enforcement as well.

3) District government is the scene of constant in-fighting, including such glories as council members' explicitly racist reasoning in refusing to confirm a recent parks appointment. Holmes-Norton's brilliant response: Put the same dysfunctional government in charge of law enforcement.

Count me as one DC voter who doesn't want to vote for a chief law enforcement officer for this city -- and doesn't want to pay or cut necessary services to replace the US Attorney's Office. Frankly, the federal government serves us better than a local prosecutor would. Sometimes, you gotta give up doctrinaire posturing and think about real-world consequences.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements