Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« DOJ: Computer Hackers Stole $9 million from ATMs in Just Hours | Main | U.S., Russian Antitrust Officials Sign Agreement »

November 10, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e201287571bd92970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Justice's Curious Comment About ABA Guidelines For Death Penalty Lawyers :

» Blog Scan from Crime and Consequences Blog
New Supreme Court Justice Biography: Erin Miller posts on SCOTUSblog that USA Today writer, Joan Biskupic, has published a new book on Justice Antonin Scalia. The book, American Original, is being advertised as "The first full-scale biography of the Su... [Read More]

» The Limited Relevance of ABA Guides from Crime and Consequences Blog
The U.S. Supreme Court today summarily reversed the Sixth Circuit for relying too much on ABA Guidelines when deciding a capital ineffective assistance case. There was no dissent. Justice Alito wrote separately to say he didn't think the Court had... [Read More]

Comments

Joe

"the Courts that follow and do not lead"

sounds elitist

anon

what is the alternative to ABA guidelines? looking to actual practice in a state like Alabama with no public defender system, very few competent capital trial attorneys, and inadequate funding for trial and appellate counsel (total appellate compensation capped at $2000)?

A purely "descriptive" approach to reasonable performance under the 6th amendment would be a practical and moral disaster in many states, and would actually encourage states to water down the quality of defense representation.

Oscar in Miami beach

It is the standards of an elitist group that being composed of private people are based on their own interest.They do not represent the majority's views nor such any Court take their recommendations to based decisions on.The problem is that Judges are lawyers and so rather than think by themeselves and research the laws,they follow the dictates of the ABA as the Bible.The Courts are wrong but the Judges are to dumb to do otherwise.Shame on the Courts that follow and do not lead.

JKP

Of course, Alito is completely wrong in part.

The ABA is certainly not "venerable".

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements