Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. has decided not to file
criminal charges against a former Justice Department official who Senate
leaders have said lied to Congress while under oath.
Bradley Schlozman, who served as the top official in Justice's Civil Rights Division under President George W. Bush, has been accused of lying to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2007 while testifying as part of the investigation into the U.S. attorney firings of 2006.
According to a report issued by the Office of the Inspector General and the Office of Professional Responsibility, Schlozman falsely testified that he did not factor politics into his hiring decisions.
In a letter to Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), Ronald Weich, assistant attorney general in the Office of Legislative Affairs, said Holder will not pursue criminal charges. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia declined to prosecute Schlozman in January. Schumer, who questioned Schlozman at the original hearing, had called on Holder to reexamine the case.
Weich says in the letter that Holder was "disturbed and dismayed" by Schlozman's actions, but came to his decision after an extensive review of the matter.
"After careful examination of the evidence and the law, and upon consideration of other relevant prosecutorial factors, the Attorney General concluded that the United States Attorney's decision was reasonable and should be afforded due deference," Weich writes.
Schlozman resigned from the Justice Department in 2007 and is now of counsel in Hinkle Elkouri's Wichita, Kansas office.
His lawyer, William Jordan, a partner in Alston & Bird's Atlanta office, said in a statement, "Brad is extremely pleased that he has been fully exonerated by this review. The Attorney General made the right decision and did not overturn the considered judgment of six senior career officials who reviewed the matter, the IG's so-called 'findings,' and declined to prosecute. As we have asserted all along, the IG issued a grossly inaccurate and biased report. Moreover, the IG flatly refused to include in his report any of the information Brad provided that demonstrated clearly that he did not make hiring decisions based upon political affiliation and had a demonstrated record of hiring and promoting individuals from across the ideological spectrum."
Schumer’s press office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Eric Holder is no more capable of upholding his oath of office than the janitor in the JUST US dept building is, as an illegal alien. Holder needs to resign, and practice law in some third world gulag where his ilk belongs, not in a building that has the word JUSTICE engraved on it's surface out front. He's antithetical to the term, and solely represents the JUST US DEPT., which is totally fitting for any number of gulags and hellholes he could work in and not have to pretend he represents the seven letter version, no hyphen.
Posted by: Holder SUCKS | September 14, 2009 at 02:16 AM
More evidence that Senator Schumer in the one that injects biased politics into every decision -- and attempts to influence -- that he makes . . .
When will NY wake up and get rid of Schumer . . . ? Incompetent, disengenuous and downright vindictive don't even begin to describe this guy . . . an excellent example of why the American people have lost all faith in Congress . . .
Posted by: Jim Hurley | September 12, 2009 at 04:06 PM
The Action Complained of Against the Bush Administration was the "Political FIRING of Attorneys," and Not the Schlozman accused "political HIRING of attorneys." With all that needs to be prosecuted by this DoJ, why spend the bullets.
Posted by: ptrkL | September 11, 2009 at 08:45 PM
Bradley Schlozman is a RICO Defendant besides misleading Congress and still practicing law. Where is our law enforcement?
Posted by: Samuel Lipari | September 11, 2009 at 05:29 PM
William Jordan overstepped when he said Attorney General Holder had exonerated Bradley Schlozman. Upholding a US Attorney's decisiopn declining to procsecute is far different from "exonerating." "Disturbing and dismaying" the Attorney General with one's unethical conduct is not the same as being exonerated.
Posted by: Kevin Ready | September 11, 2009 at 05:13 PM