Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« KBR Sued by Subcontractor | Main | D.C. Circuit Vacates Sanctions Order Against Lawyer »

July 31, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e201157159485b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supreme Court Appoints Advocate to Argue Immigration Case:

Comments

Brian

It is an overstatement to say that these counsel appointments happen "when a party decides it no longer wants to argue in favor of or against a lower court decision that is on appeal." Generally, if a party flips its position, it can just give up and settle the case, and that situation comprises the great majority of cases involving positional flips. So, the government can confess error, and work out the relief. The problem arises when the lower court says it lacks jurisdiction (authority) to do what the losing party wants done. Then, if the winner flips its position, there may be nothing that can be done to get the loser relief. That's what happened in this case.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements