Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Fannie Mae and KPMG Spar Over Attorney-Client Privilege | Main | Former D.C. Council Candidate Consents to Disbarment »

April 07, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e201156ffc397e970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sullivan to Commence Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against Stevens Prosecutors:

Comments

Professor Plum

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan said Tuesday that in his 25 years on the bench, he had never seen anything approaching the "mishandling and misconduct" perpetrated by the government in the case of former Alaskan Sen. Ted Stevens, who was convicted on corruption charges in October.

At a hearing Tuesday morning in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on the government's motion to dismiss, Sullivan said Stevens' case was symptomatic of a larger trend of misconduct. The judge urged his colleagues around the country to enter exculpatory evidence orders at the outset of every criminal case, and to require that exculpatory material be turned over in a usable form.


Why would Judge Johnson say what occurred here was symptomatic of a larger trend of misconduct? Does he have specific cases in mind? Is this just his sense of things or does he know some things we don't?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements