Mobilise this Blog

Become a Fan on Facebook

Contributors

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Newsvine Top News

HBX


IceRocket

« Thelen to Dissolve Dec. 1 | Main | Thelen Expects to Dissolve Dec. 1 »

October 28, 2008

Will Expletives Ring Out on C-SPAN?

We already know, because Carter Phillips has said so, that the tender ears of the Supreme Court justices -- and the audience at the Supreme Court in general -- will be subjected to raw expletives a week from today during oral arguments in FCC v. Fox Television Stations. That's the so-called "fleeting expletives" case in which the FCC's changing policy on the one-time, unscripted use of expletives on award shows and the like will be examined. Sidley Austin's Phillips, who will argue the case for the broadcast media, has said that unless otherwise instructed, he won't use euphemisms for the words that brought on FCC warnings.


Now comes C-SPAN into the fray. As it does several times each term, the cable network is asking the Court for same-day quick turnaround release of the audiotapes of the FCC arguments. (Without this special handling, the audio is usually not made public until after the term ends -- long after its newsworthiness has faded.) When the Court says yes to its requests, C-SPAN airs the audio of the argument within minutes of its conclusion, not just on cable but on its FM and XM radio channels.

Which raises the question whether, in airing the oral argument, C-SPAN itself will run afoul of the FCC policy at issue in the case by broadcasting the same offending words. Not likely, says this Broadcasting & Cable story which notes that expletives uttered in news broadcasts are almost certainly exempt from punishment. A C-SPAN spokesman says an advance warning will probably be given to alert listeners to the potentially offensive language.

Footnote: The latest C-SPAN request sheds light again on the Court's inscrutable criteria for deciding when to allow and when to deny broadcasters' requests for same-day access to oral argument audio. At this helpful page C-SPAN notes that last term, for example, the Court gave access to the audio of Baze v. Rees, the lethal injection case, but not the audio of Kennedy v. Louisiana, the child-rape death penalty case. It also released audio for the Guantanamo Bay case Boumediene v. Bush and the Second Amendment case D.C. v. Heller, but not for the politically charged Voter ID case of Crawford v. Marion County
  

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e2010535c61c6f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Will Expletives Ring Out on C-SPAN?:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Advertisements



Featured Job Listings

  • lawjobs.com

    TOP JOBS

Law.com Newswire

  • An Affiliate of the Law.com Network
    From the Law.com Newswire

    Sign up to receive Legal Blog Watch by email
    View a Sample

Legal Times on Flickr

Blog powered by TypePad

My Yahoo!

  • Add to My Yahoo!