• Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Kirkpatrick Officially Switches to K&L Gates | Main | Skadden Partner John Quale Dies at 61 »

July 01, 2008



Last week's widely publicized report of widespread prohibited personnel practices (PPP's) in politicized hiring practices in Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2002 and 2006 was silent to some key points including:

1) What steps will be taken to restore the scores of victims - the highly qualified applicants for career positions in Justice Dept. who were "de-selected" for unlawful reasons?

2) Why did the agency which is supposed to be primary bulwark for protecting federal employees and applicants for federal employment from PPP's - the US Office of Special Counsel (OSC) - fail so utterly?

3) Why were the "special studies" conducted by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), intended to determine if federal employees and applicants for employment are adequately protected from PPP's, fail to identify the widespread PPP's in DOJ?

I contend that OSC which should be, relatively speaking, the most essential anti-corruption agency in US Government, is likely a most corrupt and corrupting one in our government. I contend OSC's corruption and widespread corrupting influence stems primarily from its now 30-year-old bizarre, self-nullifying, misinterpretation of what is now 5 U.S.C. §1214(e) - that its requirements to report OSC's determinations of violations of "any" non-criminal laws, rules, and regulations - does not apply to the laws, rules, and regulations under OSC's investigatory and enforcement jurisdiction.

As a result of its bizarre, self-nullifying 30-year old misinterpretation of this key law, OSC has no objective nondiscretionary duty to the federal employees who seek its protection from PPP's. its key non-discretionary duty to those who seek its protection.

MSPB has played an essential role in OSC's corruption and corrupting influence by its 30-year-old misinterpretation of 5 USC 1204(a)(3) by which its "special studies" - intended to determine if federal employees and applicants for employment, in every federal agency, are being adequately protected from PPP's - do not have to consider that topic.

Neither MSPB nor OSC have inspector generals, so there is no internal check on their misinterpretation of these key laws. However, the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel ((OLC)is able to review these interpretations, if directed by the proper authority in DOJ to do so.

My recent, extensively documented, letter to Attorney General Mukasey, requesting him to direct OLC to conduct such a review, is posted online at:

. If enough stakeholders to the federal civil service and its merit system principles express support for this request, I am confident that these 30 year-old misinterpretations of law, which has resulted in immense, possibly irrecoverable, harm to our Country will be exposed and corrected.


Joe Carson, PE
Knoxville, TN

Smarter than you

The DOJ Attorney Honors Program, like a lot of new attorney recruiting, takes place long before graduation. DOJ finishes hiring for the "class of 20XX" by thanksgiving of the year before (20XX-1). That is, he would interview and be selected (or deselected) in 2006 for a job that started in the fall of 2007 (after he graduated and took the bar exam).

He didn't graduate until 2007, so not sure how he could have applied for the 2006 DOJ Honors Program class.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad