Mobilise this Blog

Become a Fan on Facebook

Contributors

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Newsvine Top News

HBX


IceRocket

« DOJ: Wesley Snipes Deserves Three Years for Tax Evasion | Main | The Morning Wrap »

April 15, 2008

Q&A with a Palfrey Juror

The news media can finally drop the “alleged” in “alleged D.C. madam.” Deborah Jeane Palfrey was convicted today on three racketeering-related counts and one count of conspiracy to launder money. You know the story by now: She was found guilty of running a prostitution ring that masqueraded as a legitimate escort service in the Washington metro area. Her clients were bigwigs, local lawyers, etc.

It took the jury less than six eight hours to conclude that Palfrey was a proper madam — this after a trial that lasted five days and featured 13 former call girls and three former johns as witnesses. We caught up with the jury foreman, Lamont Smith, after the trial. Smith, 57, a clerical researcher for the Daughters of the American Revolution, says it was a “different” experience.

BLT: “I’ll say. I was scandalized just sitting there. Did you sympathize with the witnesses?”

Smith: “I can’t say I did. We all make choices — life is choice-driven. This is a case where people made bad choices.”

BLT: “Were you uncomfortable at all when they were talking about different sex acts or sexually transmitted diseases?”

Smith: “There were one or two of us who were really taken by some of the language. None of it made me uncomfortable, though. I was used to hearing that kind of thing.”

BLT: “Er ... really?”

Smith: “Yeah, I used to be a courtroom clerk in D.C. Superior Court. I heard all sorts of things.”

BLT: “So the jury wasn’t at all swayed by [defense attorney] Preston Burton’s argument that Palfrey was just a ‘taxi dispatcher’ who had no control over her employees' behavior on the job?"

Smith: “We believe Ms. Palfrey’s lawyer did a great job, but the government’s evidence was overwhelming. The testimony, all the documents — it was insurmountable.”

BLT: “Walk me through the deliberations.”

Smith: “We went through each of the counts, one by one, looking at all the evidence. After that, each of the jurors talked for a little bit, so we could get a general feeling of where everybody was at. Then we went over the counts again, doing a point/counterpoint kind of thing. Then we took a vote.”

BLT: “Just one?”

Smith: “Yup, unanimous the first time.”

BLT: “That’s quick work. Some people say this kind of prostitution is a victimless crime. Palfrey is probably going to prison for a while. Do you think it’s fair?”

Smith: “She put herself in that position when she broke the law.”

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e200e551d659bf8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Q&A with a Palfrey Juror:

Comments

What about the men who patronized her escort service?

Why don't they get punished for breaking the law?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Advertisements



Featured Job Listings

  • lawjobs.com

    TOP JOBS

Law.com Newswire

  • An Affiliate of the Law.com Network
    From the Law.com Newswire

    Sign up to receive Legal Blog Watch by email
    View a Sample

Legal Times on Flickr

Blog powered by TypePad

My Yahoo!

  • Add to My Yahoo!