The Office of Professional Responsibility, the internal watchdog at the Justice Department, this week confirmed it is investigating the role of attorneys who authorized and oversaw the use of waterboarding by the CIA as part of a probe into all interrogation-related legal opinions.
“Among other issues, we are examining whether the legal advice contained in those memoranda was consistent with the professional standards that apply to Department of Justice attorneys,” wrote H. Marshall Jarrett, OPR’s chief, in a letter dated Feb. 18.
Jarrett’s letter was addressed to Sens. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), who had written OPR requesting an investigation into the conduct of Justice Department officials who gave the CIA the green light on harsh interrogation techniques.
Jarrett, in his letter, said the OPR investigation focuses on the drafting of the now-famous August 2002 memo by the Office of Legal Counsel and “related, subsequent OLC memoranda.” The controversial 2002 memo authorized aggressive interrogations, but it was withdrawn by OLC lawyers in 2004.
“The United States has always repudiated waterboarding as a form of torture and prosecuted it as a war crime. Justice Department officials who ignored this history — even those at the highest levels — must be held accountable for their actions,” Durbin said in a news release. “A hard look at DOJ officials who approved waterboarding as a lawful interrogation technique is long overdue.”
Whitehouse, a former federal prosecutor and state attorney general in Rhode Island, said he welcomed OPR’s inquiry and questioned how the Justice Department “overlooked its own precedents to authorize waterboarding.” “This abject failure of scholarship suggests that the answer was preordained and the department was driven by politics and obedience, not law and independence,” he said in a statement.
Peter Carr, a Justice spokesman, said the OPR investigation doesn't reflect on Attorney General Michael Mukasey's view that those who relied on OLC opinions in the past should not be investigated or prosecuted criminally.
"This is not a new investigation, but rather has been ongoing for some time," Carr said. "The fact that an inquiry is being conducted into whether the department's advice was consistent with standards of professional responsibility in no way suggests that those who rely on the department's advice should be subjected to a criminal investigation."
Earlier this month, CIA director Gen. Michael Hayden testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee that three detainees had been waterboarded and that the practice was banned in 2006 in line with current law. Similarly, Mukasey told the House Judiciary Committee on Feb. 7 that the practice of simulated drowning was deemed lawful at the time that it was used — in 2002 and 2003. Mukasey also said he would not open any criminal investigation into its use.
Recent Comments