Contributors

  • Andrew Ramonas
    Lobbying Reporter
  • Beth Frerking
    Editor in Chief
  • David Brown
    Vice President/Editor, ALM
  • Diego Radzinschi
    Photo Editor
  • Jenna Greene
    Senior Reporter
  • Marcia Coyle
    Chief Washington Correspondent
  • Mike Scarcella
    Washington Bureau Chief
  • Todd Ruger
    Capitol Hill Reporter
  • Tony Mauro
    Supreme Court Correspondent
  • Zoe Tillman
    D.C. Courts Reporter

« Morning Wrap | Main | Reforming the Prison Litigation Reform Act »

April 04, 2007

Comments

s

This post suggests that you don't have a grasp of the process behind how Justices reach their decisions. It's simply not the case that a Justice's vote is in play, and competing opinions attempt to win that Justice over. Justices make up their mind, tentatively resolve to join an opinion, and then seek to shape that opinion to retain their vote. If it doesn't, they write an opinion concurring in the judgment. In other words, the decision on the outcome is made; it's simply a matter of which reasoning the Justice agrees with: another Justice's or his/her own.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Advertisements